Hucksters Amongst Us
More on the loss of trust in academia
Many people are writing about why Americans have lost trust in universities. There are, of course, financial reasons, including—at least plausibly—the now higher unemployment rates of recent college grads and the ever-increasing cost of tuition. I leave these to the side.
I’ve written about this before but here quickly lay out what I see as a major reason for the loss of trust.
Start with the fact that many universities have stopped providing the service they were meant to—and historically did—provide. That service? Providing a system of education that creates well rounded individuals capable of independent critical thinking applicable to anything and which expands the intellectual abilities. Those universities have switched to providing career-specific education. Or what they think is career-specific education.
The result of this is a loss of trust for those that want a classic education and for those wanting career-specific education.
On the one hand, while career-specific education may be what a majority of Americans want , I’m certainly not the only person who prefers the older, classic, model. Anyone like me has good reason to distrust universities. We thought we would be sending our kids to learn to think (not what to think) with analytical precision that is applicable anywhere and everywhere, accompanied with the ability to appreciate the finer things in life—and universities no longer seem to us to do that. They can’t (or, at any rate, don’t) do that and provide career-specific education.
On the other hand, many unfortunately do want universities to provide career-specific education. There are two things to notice about this. First, a large part of the reason people want this and believe it is what they are paying for is straightforward: it’s what much of academia sells itself as doing—providing a way to improve applicants’s employability and earnings. Second, though, it’s a fool’s errand. Providing career specific education requires knowing what careers will require in the future—at least 4 years after students start college—and none of us, including University administrators, are now capable of knowing that (I’m not sure it was ever possible, but technology now just changes too quickly for it). For example, a University in 2022 might have set up a new program to train people to work in the film industry by teaching them how to use various computer programs that create CGI scenes and such, promoting this as a great way to prepare people for the TV and movie entertainment industry. Four years later, AI (LLM) systems largely removed entry level positions in such work. Too bad for those graduates. And not surprising that they and their parents lose trust in the university system. This will hold for many (or most) who go to college for supposedly career-specific education.
My conclusion from the above: given that (1) career specific education is a fool’s errand all too likely to lead to disappointment and distrust and (2) those who wanted a classic general education that trained people to be able to handle any career have been disappointed in the turning away from that, we should (3) return to that classic form of education. Those who were disappointed in the loss of that would welcome its return and, over time, regain trust in higher education. Those who wanted career-specific education might not be happy but would no longer have reason to be disappointed after paying for a failed service. On top of that, if academia returns to advertising itself as honestly providing a general education, those in both groups would know what they are buying before they buy it, this helping to increase trust in that provision. (People should always be able to know what they are buying before doing so!)
What should be done for those seeking career-specific education? The same thing that was done in the past: vocational schools should be reinvigorated. I’m not suggesting government do that reinvigorating. I would suggest those schools are well-positioned to advertise their services honestly. And if more people realize that bachelor’s degrees are not for that purpose, there should be a reduction in any ill reputation such schools receive for providing their services (when they provide them well). Going to trade school is (or can be) as valuable of an experience as going to university (more if they are honest about their wares and universities continue to dissemble). “Different strokes for different folks.”
Of course, hucksters might open schools that falsely purport to provide good vocational training, but that is always an issue. Indeed, some think universities are currently run by hucksters doing exactly that!


Best response to AI: learn to think. Then you’ll be able to judge whether AI thinks.
Terrific. The classical form of education you mention remains precious. Give young adults a few years to read, think, talk about, and explore things -- they'll be better off. Also, nowadays, it's a cool thing to do. (I can't think of many things more radical in the current context than reading widely.) Finally, we may soon reach a point where the diminishing number of people who can concentrate enough to read a long book will find themselves advantaged in the marketplace. (Though as you suggest, it's hard to know for sure.)